This is the link to my recently published article on Medium, give it a read: https://medium.com/@aidan.gwennap.18/lets-talk-about-it-movie-review-channels-on-youtube-c87ed99343de
Podcast Promotion
Hey I recently did a podcast for my Comm 232 class, you can check it out at the link here: https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/aidan-gwennap-18/episodes/2020-04-17T18_53_05-07_00
Impressions on Podcasting
With all that’s happening in the world, entertainment is more important than ever. For some this takes the form of podcasts and listening to them in their free time. Personally, I never took the chance to listen to podcasts as I substituted it with music; but recently I listened to a couple podcasts.
The first one I listened to was from Comics Experiment, a podcast that is based on comics and the pop culture aspects around it. I chose to listen to this because I am familiar with the content and with the hosts as I watch their YouTube channel. The content is very casual and is a conversation between three people. They had two topics they covered and were sponsored. This was a very calming podcast to listen to as I cared about the content a little more than a politic podcast. And due to my background with the group and content, I may have liked it more than the average consumer.
Next, I listened to the Monday Morning Podcast with comedian Bill Burr. I chose to listen to a less political podcast of his as I didn’t want to be too invested in current politics. So, this was more for comedic value but still had quite a bit of relevant material. The format is different than the previous podcast as it is Bill Burr rambling on issues rather than a discussion. But this rambling creates a stance for the listener and lets them form their own opinion off Burr’s stance. I personally am a fan of Bill Burr and his comedy, so I overall liked his podcast and found it entertaining.
The final podcast I picked was from Two Friends Friendly Mixes, a music podcast. Now this podcast is the most different from the classic format as it is a music podcast. The format was completely consisting of music. It had no conversations among podcasters, but rather was only music that was created by the duo. I found this very enjoyable as it didn’t have the typical podcast format where you just listen to a person or group speak about an issue.
Finally, I had to listen to two podcasts required the first being from Call Your Girlfriend. This was a special episode as they discuss how podcasters make their money. They discuss how being a businesswoman is difficult and how they have to set certain plans such as their $25 an hour minimum wage. This was definitely an interesting podcast, however in my opinion I would not listen to it on the daily. The topic is important and should be brought up and a podcast is a great place to do so. One thing I did like about this podcast was the obvious chemistry between the women, as they were very comfortable with each other and had a great back and forth when discussing the issue. Obviously I may not be the target demographic they’re trying to appeal to, but I found this podcast enjoyable when I did listen to it.
The second required podcast was from the NYTimes. Just based off the title, the listener can infer that this is a political podcast. Personally, if I were to listen to a podcast I would not listen to something like this as I want to relax or get enjoyment out of a podcast; while this is very factual. That being said it is a very well formatted podcast. They used quotes from news clips and spoke in a calm manner without trying to start an argument. The sound quality was fine, however at some points it got a little grainy sounding but that is a minor complaint. Overall, this podcast was interesting but I didn’t enjoy it like the others. The host was good but didn’t have much of a personality in my opinion and due to the nature of the content he didn’t need to. But the facts and format of the podcast were strong so it was just the content that brought the experience down for me.
Overall, I enjoyed almost all the podcasts I listened to. The host really made the podcast for me and most of them had enough personality to carry the podcast. The formatting overall was strong with no one podcast being too weak in that department. Two Friend Friendly Mixes was definitely the most different of the selections as it had no specific narrative and was just music, but that isn’t an issue. My overall opinion of podcasting has changed quite a bit after listening to these and I can see the obvious merit and why these are so successful. However, I can not see myself listening to a podcast everyday as a replacement for music; but as with everything that is based on personal opinion.
Daily News Blog #3
The final day of going across my twitter feed ends with looking at only two articles.
The first article I saw was on APNews and it addressed the new movie ‘The Way Back’. It addresses star Ben Affleck’s view on the film and how it interweaves with his life. The author writes about Affleck and his view on the film and how it has effected him. Due to his issues with alcohol and familial issues, the article is framed to center it around the life of Affleck and put the movie industry into it. Framing wise, it is quite well done including images which help the audience create a mental image. Also, something that is very different than the other articles I have read, is that is based on a celebrity and the film industry rather than politics. With this topic, the format is more informative and leaves room for less bias. As it is telling a story rather than giving their opinion on the subject.
Ending the trend of reading articles from my feed, I went back to another politic article on CNN. Unlike the previous article, CNN decides to tackle the issue of Confederate paraphernalia in the United States Marines. Again this is an informative article, as it is stating the issue rather than trying to pick a side of an argument. However, this is very different than the other article that was based on pop culture. This is an article based on only information and doesn’t choose to attempt to invoke emotion or try to get the audience to understand their point. Formatting wise, the lack of visuals makes the message the main focus rather than having an image take the reader away. With a simple structure, they achieve getting their point across while not making the information too hard to digest to the common reader.
Overall, these articles were very insightful into how different articles can be written. Even though most of the articles I read were based in politics, they chose to format them differently. With either the inclusion of images or length of the article. These were interesting reads and helped my understanding the current climate in America.
Daily News Blog #2
Today, I also looked at Twitter for my sources and news.
The first source was from the VirginianPilot and like the name implies, the issue is one that is prevalent in Virginia. Author Mary Albiges writes about the fact of popular vote in our state concerning the President. The narrative of the article focuses on the history of the idea in Virginia. The headline of the article brings the author’s idea on the subject to the forefront, blatantly stating that “Virginia won’t join national push to have popular vote pick the president, at least for now” as the title. Acknowledging that even though the option isn’t favorable now, there is a possibility for it in the future. Overall, the article was not too packed with information but it has enough for the basic reader. It effectively gets the point of debate across without bogging it down with too much extra material. This is a good starting point if you are interested in the subject, rather than something created for the demographic in which this knowledge is commonly known.
The next article was retrieved from FiveThirtyEight, a ABCNews site. This is an article on what defines Senator Sander’s “coalition”. The main point of the article is to inform about the voter demographic. One main example that is used is a visual of the voter demographic charting ages and party alignments. Format wise, this article is very much structured to inform and not just notify. Included in this article are detailed facts and verifiable information. Unlike the previous article, this is a topic that is country wide rather than located in a specific state. The author does an excellent job of informing the audience and expanding upon the information given.
Finally, I went to the New York Times Politics site to see their opinion on the current issue of coronavirus. The angle played by the author Neil Irwin is not that of health, rather it is of economics. In the article, it is addressed how current President Trump is focused on the stock market and its well-being rather than the outbreak of coronavirus that has many citizens concerned. With this premise, the article is obviously formed to inform of an issue and frame a perpetrator. The author is functioning as the critic against the government and its actions. This is done with quoting tweets made by President Trump and quoting members of the administration. Very different from the other articles read, this stands for a certain message and doesn’t have the audience form their own opinion and rather gives them one to side with.
Overall, these 3 articles were different but all had content based on the political system of the United States. However the differences such as scale and issue addressed really made the articles worth reading. As seeing the different perspectives and reasoning for covering the issues is interesting.
My Live Tweeting Experience
Yesterday, Tuesday, February 25th, I live tweeted the first hour of the democratic debate which took place on CBSNews. Concerning the debate, all the candidates who were running were present and ready to debate. This was a very important debate for the candidates, as winning over South Carolina would mean that they probably would be the leading Democratic candidate. Overall, the experience created out of the environment on screen was not positive. Due to every candidates separate agenda, there was no coordination or ease in which I could watch the debate and tweet; without feeling tired. For more than half of my viewing, the candidates were at each other’s throats and treated each other with hostility. Something that shouldn’t be happening in a party, but is now commonplace in our governmental politics. I believe that in this case, live-tweeting was not worth the time or fun; as everyone was biased towards different issues and if I wanted the highlights from the debate, I could check Twitter. Thank you for reading, a couple of the tweets I made are below, but if you want to see the rest: https://twitter.com/AidanG76978999
“Elizabeth Warren goes on the offensive and defends her point that @MikeBloomberg is the “riskiest candidate”. And now they have started to debate this in detail. #DemDebate“
“The debate has now gone onto attacks on others platforms. Starting with @JoeBiden bringing up points and then @TomSteyer jumping in. But this debate is still not very organized as most are aiming at @BernieSanders“
Daily News Blog
Today, I looked across my twitter feed to make sure I was up to date in the news. When looking, I found 3 articles that really stood out to me.
First, I read an article on intermittent fasting, written by Jane E. Brody. In this article by DailyPress, they outline the positives gained from fasting intermittently; something that was very evident from even just reading the headline. As a digital journalist, Brody does a good job as it starts with an image that draws the reader in. However, this is an article in which it is very information heavy and more list like in instructions to intermittently fast. The addition of a link to a video would be appreciated as hearing the process out loud could give the audience a voice to hear.
The next article I read was in the New York Times. Unlike the previous article on DailyPress, this is based on politics. A very political article, even starting from the headline of “To This Group, Labor Is More Than a ‘White Man Who Works in a Factory’”. The author, Isabella Grullon Paz, writes about the issues of domestic work and how the workforce is viewed by politicians. Obviously a very different article than the first, it is also framed differently. More to inform than instruct or provide a solution, this article is framed to bring up the issue and give a possible solution.
Finally, I read another article on the New York Times. Again the publisher has more political content than DailyPress. This time they focus on the global economy, specifically in India. Specifically, the Trump owned estates in the country and how the country isn’t suited for the business of real estate. Again focusing more on politics or economics, this article informs of issues while hoping for action. This article also includes visual aids throughout the writing as this helps create emphasis on the issue.
Overall the articles looked at were all quite similar in format, with the occasional deviation. All had a basic form of having the words speak for themselves, without too much aid from visuals or audio. However, it would have been useful in the first article. Regardless, these all gave a strong sense of what is happening and why it is important to us as the audience.
Medium Article Post
I recently just published my first article on Medium.com. It’s about a 6 minute read and addresses YouTube censorship issues and how I believe its unnecessary. Using many different sources, I wrote this in to help people see how this policy has affected creators and users of the platform.

Live Blogging: The Basketball Rivalry of CNU vs. Salisbury
On Saturday, February 15th the Christopher Newport Captains will play against Salisbury College in a basketball game that will determine a lot. There is a well known rivalry between these two teams and schools, so hopefully the turnout will reflect that. Depending on who wins, the outlook of the rest of the season will be determined. As a win for either team could be devastating or uplifting to the moral of the players.

2:00pm: Starting the game, the teams are announced and the banner is played by the band. A ceremony for the seniors of the team is also conducted
2:07pm: Game starts and Captains start with the ball. Points are alreasy tied at 2 to 2.
2:14: Captains are up 5 to 2 in the span of less than 10 minutes.
2:20: Captains have gained a larger lead with 15 points to Salisbury’s 7. Theres 3 minutes left in the frist period. Making two 3 point shots.
2:25: The lead has been raised as the Captains have gained 4 more points to have 19 points with Salisbury at 7. And thats the end of the 1st quarter. The band begins to play.
2:30: Salisbury has gained 2 points while the Captains remain at 19.
2:35: Both Captains and Salisbury have gained ground. With home team at 24 and away at 15.
2:40: Salisbury have gotten two more points with a foul shot, while the captains have gained 3 more points.
2:45: Game is still close, Captains with the lead of 30-26. Salisbury has been picking up in the last 10 minutes.
2:50: Halftime begins. CNU:32, Salisbury:28. Dance team performs and the band will play. With a guest appearance by CNU Mini-Storm, along with CNU Storm.
3:00: The halftime show has ended and the teams are warming up again. If you want anymore coverage of the game, keep it up with it on CNU’s athletic department’s site. Current score is 32-28. Thank you for keeping up, have a nice day
Overall, the game was a nail biting display of both teams skill and the crowd was waiting to see who emerged victorious. Both teams of women put their all into the game and the final score was 72-68, with CNU emerging as victors. This was a very close game, with Salisbury catching up very quickly in the second half, but the Captains maintaining their lead. Winning this match surely brings up the morale of the Captains, as defeating their rivals is a monumental moment of the season. This also brings their record to a 20-4 win/loss ratio, making Salisbury have a new standing with a 10-14 win/loss ratio. The outcome of this game has most likely decided how the Captains are going to do for the rest of the season and hopefully they continue their winning streak.
Annotated Bibliography
Chen, Y., & Yang, D. Y. (2019). The Impact of Media Censorship: 1984 or Brave New World?†. American Economic Review, 109(6), 2294–2332. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171765
In Chen and Yang’s article, they outline how media censorship is an authoritarian way of living. As they cite China as a prime example of this issue. They used a field experiment with students in Beijing to see if the internet should be subject to the censorship imposed by the government. The aspects that seem to be affected the most are knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and the intended behaviors of the students. As they tend to go to foreign news outlets to get information they can’t get from local outlets. Although they cite that China is successful with their censorship to media as their citizens do not demand the information denied by the government. As they have been raised in that created environment.
This is relevant to my article as the issue of media censorship is a global issue. This article commenting on the impact it has in China is a prime example of this. Which can help form an argument of how successfulness of the policy doesn’t necessarily mean it’s good.
Shao, L. (2018). The Dilemma of Criticism: Disentangling the Determinants of Media Censorship in China. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2018.19
In the article written by Shao, it states how the mass media censorship present in China is majorly political. China has these censorship policies in place to block political challenges to their government and to tolerate criticism of said government. Implementing these censors in ways that prevent or dissuade political issues.
Relating to my topic, this could help as it outlines how media can be driven by politics. So, in some cases the censorship is influenced by the government and not the platform. If the censorship is imposed by the government, there isn’t a solution that the platform could provide without being illegal. So, by analyzing censorship in America, somewhere where these aren’t government led censorships, we can figure out why they are imposed.
BOLLINGER, L. (2012). Defending Free Speech in the Digital Age. Foreign Policy, (197), 52-53. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/41726931
In Bollinger’s article, he addresses how free speech is an issue globally. Stating how in many places, the government or corporations set limits on what can be said on certain platforms. He also addresses how in the 21st century, putting limits on citizens is getting harder and harder. Becoming more difficult as technology advances and more have access to the internet and global platforms. Finally, concluding in how solving this issue will take time and effort, with the example of the United States only getting these liberties in the early 20th century.
When using this in my argument, it could give history behind media censorship and help explain some reasonings behind it for some countries. Also it could give recognizable examples of censorship in digital media history.